The value of the UK Clinical Aptitude Test in predicting pre-clinical performance: a prospective cohort study at Nottingham Medical School
Open Access
- 28 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 10 (1), 55
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-55
Abstract
The UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) was introduced in 2006 as an additional tool for the selection of medical students. It tests mental ability in four distinct domains (Quantitative Reasoning, Verbal Reasoning, Abstract Reasoning, and Decision Analysis), and the results are available to students and admissions panels in advance of the selection process. As yet the predictive validity of the test against course performance is largely unknown. The study objective was to determine whether UKCAT scores predict performance during the first two years of the 5-year undergraduate medical course at Nottingham. We studied a single cohort of students, who entered Nottingham Medical School in October 2007 and had taken the UKCAT. We used linear regression analysis to identify independent predictors of marks for different parts of the 2-year preclinical course. Data were available for 204/260 (78%) of the entry cohort. The UKCAT total score had little predictive value. Quantitative Reasoning was a significant independent predictor of course marks in Theme A ('The Cell'), (p = 0.005), and Verbal Reasoning predicted Theme C ('The Community') (p < 0.001), but otherwise the effects were slight or non-existent. This limited study from a single entry cohort at one medical school suggests that the predictive value of the UKCAT, particularly the total score, is low. Section scores may predict success in specific types of course assessment. The ultimate test of validity will not be available for some years, when current cohorts of students graduate. However, if this test of mental ability does not predict preclinical performance, it is arguably less likely to predict the outcome in the clinical years. Further research from medical schools with different types of curriculum and assessment is needed, with longitudinal studies throughout the course.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of A level and UKCAT performance in students applying to UK medical and dental schools in 2006: cohort studyBMJ, 2010
- Does the UKCAT predict Year 1 performance in medical school?Medical Education, 2009
- A comparison of the United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UK-CAT) with a traditional admission selection processMedical Teacher, 2009
- Even one star at A level could be "too little, too late" for medical student selectionBMC Medical Education, 2008
- Demographic and socio-economic associations with academic attainment (UCAS tariff scores) in applicants to medical schoolMedical Education, 2007
- Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: reviewBMJ, 2006
- Comparison of academic, application form and social factors in predicting early performance on the medical courseMedical Education, 2004
- A levels and intelligence as predictors of medical careers in UK doctors: 20 year prospective studyBMJ, 2003
- Selection for medical school: just pick the right students and the rest is easy!Medical Education, 2003
- Academic and non-academic predictors of success on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course 1970-1995Medical Education, 2001