The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
Open Access
- 6 July 2016
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in mBio
- Vol. 7 (3), e00809-16
- https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00809-16
Abstract
Inaccurate data in scientific papers can result from honest error or intentional falsification. This study attempted to determine the percentage of published papers that contain inappropriate image duplication, a specific type of inaccurate data. The images from a total of 20,621 papers published in 40 scientific journals from 1995 to 2014 were visually screened. Overall, 3.8% of published papers contained problematic figures, with at least half exhibiting features suggestive of deliberate manipulation. The prevalence of papers with problematic images has risen markedly during the past decade. Additional papers written by authors of papers with problematic images had an increased likelihood of containing problematic images as well. As this analysis focused only on one type of data, it is likely that the actual prevalence of inaccurate data in the published literature is higher. The marked variation in the frequency of problematic images among journals suggests that journal practices, such as prepublication image screening, influence the quality of the scientific literature.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- PrPST, a Soluble, Protease Resistant and Truncated PrP Form Features in the Pathogenesis of a Genetic Prion DiseasePLOS ONE, 2013
- Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?PLOS ONE, 2013
- HIV-1 Tat Protein Increases Microglial Outward K+ Current and Resultant Neurotoxic ActivityPLOS ONE, 2013
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publicationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
- Reactive Oxygen Species-Triggered Trophoblast Apoptosis Is Initiated by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress via Activation of Caspase-12, CHOP, and the JNK Pathway in Toxoplasma gondii Infection in MiceInfection and Immunity, 2012
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer researchNature, 2012
- Retracted Science and the Retraction IndexInfection and Immunity, 2011
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey DataPLOS ONE, 2009
- How many scientific papers should be retracted?EMBO Reports, 2007
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005