COMMENT ON “MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: HOW MUCH ERROR IS THERE AND HOW DOES IT INFLUENCE EFFECTSIZE ESTIMATES?” by GERHART, WRIGHT, MC MAHAN, AND SNELL
- 7 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 53 (4), 835-854
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02419.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of human resource practices in petro-chemical refinery performanceThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1999
- THE IMPACT HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS, IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTIVENESS, AND ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGY ON SHAREHOLDER WEALTH.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1997
- Methodological Issues in Cross‐Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource‐Firm Performance LinkIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1996
- Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: Testing a Contingency Model of Executive ControlsJournal of Management, 1995
- Human resource management and firm performance: Testing a contingency model of executive controlsJournal of Management, 1995
- Direct estimates of SDy and the implications for utility analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992
- INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING AND JOB DESIGN: MODERATING EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL INERTIA.The Academy of Management Journal, 1991
- THE EFFECTS OF PSYCHOLOGICALLY BASED INTERVENTION PROGRAMS ON WORKER PRODUCTIVITY: A META‐ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 1985
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984