The democratic fallacy in matters of clinical opinion: implications for analysing cause-of-death data
Open Access
- 11 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
- Vol. 8 (1), 1
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-8-1
Abstract
Arriving at a consensus between multiple clinical opinions concerning a particular case is a complex issue - and may give rise to manifestations of the democratic fallacy, whereby a majority opinion is misconstrued to represent some kind of "truth" and minority opinions are somehow "wrong". Procedures for handling multiple clinical opinions in epidemiological research are not well established, and care is needed to avoid logical errors. How to handle physicians' opinions on cause of death is one important domain of concern in this respect. Whether multiple opinions are a legal requirement, for example ahead of cremating a body, or used for supposedly greater rigour, for example in verbal autopsy interpretation, it is important to have a clear understanding of what unanimity or disagreement in findings might imply, and of how to aggregate case data accordingly.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moving from Data on Deaths to Public Health Policy in Agincourt, South Africa: Approaches to Analysing and Understanding Verbal Autopsy FindingsPLoS Medicine, 2010
- A mixed-methods prospective study of death certification in general practiceFamily Practice, 2010
- Verbal Autopsy: Methods in TransitionEpidemiologic Reviews, 2010
- Verbal autopsy coding: are multiple coders better than one?Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2009
- Consultants’ Conflicts: A Case Discussion of Differences and Their ResolutionPsychosomatics, 2008
- Setting international standards for verbal autopsyPublished by WHO Press ,2007
- The InterVA model: verbal autopsy interpretation in rural EthiopiaPublished by WHO Press ,2006
- Potential and limits of verbal autopsiesPublished by WHO Press ,2006
- Implications of Harold Shipman for general practicePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2004
- In Search of Tools to Aid Logical Thinking and Communicating about Medical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 2001