Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Urology
- Vol. 64 (3), 448-455
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.045
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- European Research Council (243115, FP7/2007-2013)
- KWF Kankerbestrijding (KUN 2007/3971)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Back to the FutureEuropean Urology, 2013
- In Vivo Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging at 3 T with an Endorectal CoilEuropean Urology, 2011
- Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and StagingRadiology, 2011
- Diffusion-weighted Endorectal MR Imaging at 3 T for Prostate Cancer: Tumor Detection and Assessment of AggressivenessRadiology, 2011
- Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate CancerRadiology, 2011
- Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population‐based studyBJU International, 2009
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimensUrologic Oncology, 2007
- Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation with Morphology and Tumour Stage, Histological Grade and PSAClinical Radiology, 2000
- Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 MenJournal of Urology, 1994