Comparison of changes in upper and lower extremity impairments and disabilities after stroke
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
- Vol. 26 (2), 109-116
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200306000-00005
Abstract
The aims of this study were to determine if the changes in impairment and disability measures for the upper and lower extremities were equivalent during the post-stroke rehabilitation period and whether the rates of change were maintained 6 months after discharge from rehabilitation. A prospective cohort study design was used. One-hundred-and-thirty-two people who had sustained a stroke and who were enrolled in an intensive functional rehabilitation programme were recruited. Upper and lower extremity impairments and disabilities were evaluated at admission, at discharge from rehabilitation and 6 months later. During active rehabilitation, the changes in both extremities were smaller for the impairment measures (standardized response mean (SRM), 0.37-0.63) than the disability measures (SRM, 0.76-1.05). While the changes in upper and lower extremities were equivalent for impairment measures, they were larger in the lower extremity for disability measures, indicating that the rate of functional improvement was faster in the lower extremity during active rehabilitation. After discharge, however, while the rate of motor recovery in the lower extremity dropped (SRM, 0.54-0.18), it was maintained in the upper extremity (SRM, 0.45 and 0.42). Present findings indicate that functional (disability) measures improve faster than impairment measures in both extremities during the active rehabilitation period and suggest that motor recovery occurs at a different rate in the upper and lower extremities, with that of the upper extremity occurring later and extending into the period after discharge from active rehabilitation.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke.Clinical Rehabilitation, 2001
- The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up studyDisability and Rehabilitation, 1999
- Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilitiesInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1998
- Validity of the TEMPA: A Measurement Instrument for Upper Extremity PerformanceThe Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1994
- Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke.Stroke, 1994
- Stroke DisabilityPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1994
- Development and Reliability of an Upper Extremity Function Test for the Elderly: The TEMPACanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993
- Recovery of functional status after stroke. A postrehabilitation follow-up study.Stroke, 1993
- Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health StatusMedical Care, 1989
- Recovery of motor function following stroke: Profile and predictorsPhysiotherapy Canada, 1982