Lay patient navigator program implementation for equal access to cancer care and clinical trials
Open Access
- 31 October 2006
- Vol. 107 (11), 2669-2677
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22319
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Disparities in cancer detection, treatment, and outcomes among racial/ethnic minorities and low-income patients are well documented. One way to reduce these disparities is to use patient navigators to address barriers to care. However, little information about optimal characteristics of navigator programs or considerations for those interested in setting up such programs is available. METHODS. The design and implementation of a patient navigator program for underserved cancer patients in an urban, nonacademic community hospital setting is described. The program, which used lay navigators, was conceived as a component of the Urban Latino African American Cancer (ULAAC) Disparities Project in South Los Angeles, a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored project to improve cancer care and clinical trial access for minority and low-income patients. RESULTS. Careful initial planning, including input from a community advisory committee, was essential to smooth program implementation. Thirty-one volunteers completed navigator training in the program's first year of operation. Of 135 patients offered navigation services, 75 (56%) accepted, and preliminary feedback from patients, navigators, and providers suggests high levels of satisfaction with navigation. Standardized templates used by navigators and staff to record key information are proving helpful for monitoring quality and outcomes (such as effectiveness in addressing specific barriers to care) and continually improving the program. CONCLUSIONS. The ULAAC program represents a viable model for developing lay navigator programs in community hospitals. Preliminary assessments suggest that the program has a positive effect on minority and low-income cancer patients' experience with care and reduces barriers to care. Additional time and research are needed, however, to fully assess the impact on care and outcomes. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- "Step into My Zapatos, Doc": Understanding and Reducing Communication Disparities in the Multicultural Informed Consent SettingPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2005
- Colorectal Cancer and Race: Understanding the Differences in Outcomes Between African Americans and WhitesMedical Clinics of North America, 2005
- Using navigators to improve care of underserved patientsCancer, 2005
- Increasing Access to Clinical Cancer Trials and Emerging Technologies for Minority Populations: The Native American ProjectJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Why Cancer Patients Enter Randomized Clinical Trials: Exploring the Factors That Influence Their DecisionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Health Care in America — Still Too Separate, Not Yet EqualThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- The Inclusion of Minority Groups in Clinical Trials: Problems of Under Representation and Under Reporting of DataAccountability in Research, 2004
- Racial differences in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and radiation therapy between Whites and BlacksAnnals of Epidemiology, 2004
- Racial disparities in breast carcinoma survival ratesCancer, 2003
- Racial Injustice in Health CareThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000