Effect of well chamber altitude pressure corrections for cesium Blu 131 Cs and CivaDot 103 Pd brachytherapy sources
- 30 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 48 (10), 5584-5592
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15190
Abstract
Purpose Previous publications have described how the standard temperature and pressure correction will overcorrect measurements with a low-energy photon low-dose rate brachytherapy source at low ambient air pressures. To account for this effect, an additional correction factor is applied after the standard temperature and pressure correction. This additional correction is dependent on the source being measured and the chamber it is measured in. Well chamber corrections for two sources and findings regarding aspects that may affect the altitude response of the sources are presented. Methods A purpose-built pressure vessel was constructed previously which could achieve pressures ranging from 74.661 kPa to 106.66 kPa (560 mmHg to 800 mmHg). Three Cesium Blu sources (131Cs) from Isoray Inc. and three CivaDots (103Pd) from CivaTech Oncology Inc. were tested over this pressure range in increments of 2.7 kPa (20 mmHg) in three HDR 1000 Plus chambers, and the Cesium Blu sources were also tested in two IVB 1000 chambers. Both chamber models are air communicating well-type ionization chambers produced by Standard Imaging Inc. Multiple runs of each source/chamber combination were completed, corrected with the standard temperature and pressure correction, normalized to the result at 101.325 kPa, and averaged with runs of the same combination. The chamber response was also simulated using MCNP6 to validate the experimental results. Results Measurements of both sources in all chambers followed the expected power dependence on ambient pressure as seen in previous studies. The Cesium Blu source, however, demonstrated a significant difference in response in the HDR 1000 Plus chamber versus the IVB 1000 chamber. For an altitude correction factor of the form, PA = k1(P)k2, new coefficients are proposed for both sources for pressure units of kPa and mmHg. The Monte Carlo calculated chamber response agreed with the experimental results within 2% for all sources and chambers at all pressures. Conclusions Altitude correction coefficients for two new low-energy photon low-dose rate brachytherapy sources are provided. The directional dependence of the CivaDot has no bearing on its dependence on pressure, however the difference in construction materials from other 103Pd sources leads to unique correction coefficients. The higher energy of the Cesium Blu source with respect to 103Pd and 125I sources yields a difference in correction factors depending on which model chamber is used for air-kerma strength calculations. Clinics must be careful to select the correct pair of coefficients for the chamber model they used. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reservedKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Technical Note: Empirical altitude correction factors for well chamber measurements of permanent prostate and breast seed implant sourcesMedical Physics, 2017
- Dependence with air density of the response of the PTW SourceCheck ionization chamber for low energy brachytherapy sourcesMedical Physics, 2013
- The effect of ambient pressure on well chamber response: Monte Carlo calculated results for the HDR 1000 PlusMedical Physics, 2005
- The effect of ambient pressure on well chamber response: Experimental results with empirical correction factorsMedical Physics, 2005
- Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculationsMedical Physics, 2004
- Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy: Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 64Medical Physics, 1999
- AAPM's TG‐51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high‐energy photon and electron beamsMedical Physics, 1999
- Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56Medical Physics, 1997
- Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43Medical Physics, 1995
- Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40Medical Physics, 1994