Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Accounting and Business Research
- Vol. 40 (3), 229-256
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9663398
Abstract
This paper discusses differences in countries’ approaches to reporting regulation and explores the reasons why they exist in the first place as well as why they are likely to persist. I first delineate various regulatory choices and discuss the trade‐offs associated with these choices. I also provide a framework that can explain differences in corporate reporting regulation. Next, I present descriptive and stylised evidence on regulatory and institutional differences across countries. There are robust institutional clusters around the world. I discuss that these clusters are likely to persist given the complementarities among countries’ institutions. An important implication of this finding is that reporting practices are unlikely to converge globally, despite efforts to harmonise reporting standards. Convergence of reporting practices is also unlikely due to persistent enforcement differences around the world. Given an ostensibly strong demand for convergence in reporting practices for globally operating firms, I propose a different way forward that does not require convergence of reporting regulation and enforcement across countries. The idea is to create a ‘global player segment’, in which member firms play by the same reporting rules and face the same enforcement. Such a segment could be created and administered by a supra‐national body like IOSCO.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public FirmsThe Accounting Review, 2006
- The economic consequences of increased disclosure: Evidence from international cross-listings☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2006
- Economic consequences of SEC disclosure regulation: evidence from the OTC bulletin boardJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2005
- Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timelinessJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2005
- Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countriesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2003
- Law and finance: why does legal origin matter?Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003
- Economic development, legality, and the transplant effectEuropean Economic Review, 2003
- The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earningsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2000
- Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority ShareholdersJournal of Political Economy, 1998
- Reforming corporate governance: redirecting the European agendaEconomic Policy, 1997