Multidimensionality and Structural Coefficient Bias in Structural Equation Modeling
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 17 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 73 (1), 5-26
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
Abstract
In this study, the authors consider several indices to indicate whether multidimensional data are “unidimensional enough” to fit with a unidimensional measurement model, especially when the goal is to avoid excessive bias in structural parameter estimates. They examine two factor strength indices (the explained common variance and omega hierarchical) and several model fit indices (root mean square error of approximation, comparative fit index, and standardized root mean square residual). These statistics are compared in population correlation matrices determined by known bifactor structures that vary on the (a) relative strength of general and group factor loadings, (b) number of group factors, and (c) number of items or indicators. When fit with a unidimensional measurement model, the degree of structural coefficient bias depends strongly and inversely on explained common variance, but its effects are moderated by the percentage of correlations uncontaminated by multidimensionality, a statistic that rises combinatorially with the number of group factors. When the percentage of uncontaminated correlations is high, structural coefficients are relatively unbiased even when general factor strength is low relative to group factor strength. On the other hand, popular structural equation modeling fit indices such as comparative fit index or standardized root mean square residual routinely reject unidimensional measurement models even in contexts in which the structural coefficient bias is low. In general, such statistics cannot be used to predict the magnitude of structural coefficient bias.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling General and Specific Variance in Multifaceted Constructs: A Comparison of the Bifactor Model to Other ApproachesJournal of Personality, 2011
- Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumptionQuality of Life Research, 2009
- A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of LifeMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2006
- The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation ModelingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.Psychological Assessment, 1995
- Structural Equations with Latent VariablesPublished by Wiley ,1989
- Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenlsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1985
- Application of Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models to Multidimensional DataApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- The Bi-factor methodPsychometrika, 1937