A Case of Mixed Motives?: Formal and Informal Functions of Administrative Immigration Detention
- 8 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Criminology
- Vol. 50 (5), 830-850
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq035
Abstract
In most EU countries and the United States, immigration detention is defined as an administrative, non-punitive measure to facilitate expulsion. This paper argues that immigration detention in the Netherlands serves three informal functions in addition to its formal function as an instrument of expulsion: (1) deterring illegal residence, (2) controlling pauperism and (3) managing popular anxiety by symbolically asserting state control. These informal functions indicate that society has not found a definitive solution for the presence of migrants who are not admitted but are also difficult to expel. The analysis, which is placed against the background of the functions of penal detention, is based on policy documents, survey data, administrative data and fieldwork in a Dutch immigration detention centre.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Return to sender?Punishment & Society, 2010
- WOMEN'S IMPRISONMENT AS A MECHANISM OF MIGRATION CONTROL IN HONG KONGThe British Journal of Criminology, 2007
- The New Digital Borders of EuropeInternational Sociology, 2007
- Creating the responsible prisonerPunishment & Society, 2007
- Border ProphylaxisCultural Dynamics, 2006
- How iron is the iron cage of new penology?Punishment & Society, 2006
- International migration, remittances and development: myths and factsThird World Quarterly, 2005
- Detention of asylum seekers in the US, UK, France, Germany, and ItalyCriminal Justice, 2005
- THE NEW PENOLOGY: NOTES ON THE EMERGING STRATEGY OF CORRECTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS*Criminology, 1992
- Sociological Perspectives on PunishmentCrime and Justice, 1991