Abstract
Existing theories of the adaptive value of vertical migration are examined and found wanting. Adult size and generation length are negative functions of temperature. It is shown that Bělehrádek's temperature function gives a close fit to size and development rate of several species of zooplankters growing in adequate food supply, although conclusions do not depend on the theoretical content of this equation. Fecundity is an exponential function of adult size, and enough data are available for two quite different zooplankters — the copepod Pseudocalanus minutus and the chaetognath Sagitta elegans — to depict relative rates of increase as generally positive functions of temperature. Diurnal migrants are known to feed nearer the surface, which is almost universally warmer. Increased fecundity gained by spending part time in deeper, cooler waters, might be offset by slower development, although interrupted or seasonal breeders could sacrifice development rate for greater ultimate fecundity. However, an animal which does all necessary feeding in warm surface waters and "rests" in cooler waters gains an energy bonus which may be put into fecundity. A model of the effect on fecundity is derived from a much-generalized version of von Bertalanffy's growth equation. From the most probable range of solutions it is deduced that migration in thermally stratified waters would be disadvantageous when surface waters were cool, but increasingly advantageous as surface waters warmed up, and this is supported by empirical evidence. The theory accounts for many geographical, seasonal, systematic and ontogenetic regularities in the large and confusing literature on vertical migration.