Reconstructive Democratic Theory
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 87 (1), 48-60
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2938955
Abstract
While the idea of democracy has never been more universal or more popular, both democratic theory and the empirical study of democratic possibilities are in some disarray. We seek a productive reconnection of these two endeavors with democratic discourse through close attention to the language of democracy as used by ordinary people and political actors. Reconstructive inquiry determines how the individuals who are the potential constituents of any democratic order themselves conceptualize democracy and their own political roles and competences. We deploy an intensive method—Q methodology—for the study of individual characteristics, capabilities, and dispositions in combination with political discourse analysis. Four discourses are discovered in an analysis of selected U.S. subjects: contented republicanism, deferential conservatism, disaffected populism, and private liberalism. These results can be used to relate democratic theory to live possibilities in democratic discourse.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Battle of Democracy: Conflict, Consensus, and the Individual. By Keith Graham. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble, 1986. 261p. $28.75. - Models of Democracy. By David Held. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987. 321p. $35.00 cloth, $12.95 paper. - The Theory of Democracy Revisited. By Giovanni Sartori. 2 vols. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1987. 542p. $40.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.American Political Science Review, 1989
- Q MethodologyJournal of Marketing Research, 1989
- American States of Mind: Political Beliefs and Behavior among Private and Public Workers.Social Forces, 1989
- Between Philosophy and Politics: The Alienation of Political Theory. By John G. Gunnell (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1986. 240p. $25.00, cloth; $12.95, paper).American Political Science Review, 1987
- Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political ScienceJournal of Marketing Research, 1982
- The Changing American VoterBritish Journal of Sociology, 1979
- Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1978
- Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway.American Sociological Review, 1967
- Political IdeologyBritish Journal of Sociology, 1965
- The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1955