The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study
Preprint
- 24 November 2021
- preprint
- research article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Abstract
Background: Governments across the WHO European Region prioritized dashboards for reporting COVID-19 data. The ubiquitous use of dashboards for public reporting is novel. This study explores the development of COVID-19 dashboards during the pandemic’s first year and common barriers, enablers and lessons from the experiences of teams responsible for their development.Methods: Multiple methods were applied to identify and recruit COVID-19 dashboard teams using a purposive, quota sampling approach. Semi-structured group interviews were conducted between April– June 2021. Using elaborative coding and thematic analysis, descriptive and explanatory themes were derived from interview data. A validation workshop with study participants was held in June 2021.Results: Eighty informants, representing 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams across the WHO European Region participated. Most dashboards were launched swiftly in the first months of the pandemic, between February–May 2020. The urgency, intense workload, limited human resources, data and privacy constraints, and public scrutiny were common to the initial development stage. Themes related to barriers or enablers were identified pertaining to the pre-pandemic context, pandemic itself, people and processes, software, data, and users. Lessons emerged around the themes of simplicity, trust, partnership, software and data, and change.Conclusions: COVID-19 dashboards were developed in a learning-by-doing approach. The experiences of teams signal initial under-preparedness was compensated by high-level political endorsement, the professionalism of teams, accelerated data improvements, and immediate support of commercial software solutions. To leverage the full potential of dashboards, investments are needed at team-, national- and pan-European-level.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effective presentation of health care performance information for consumer decision making: A systematic reviewPatient Education and Counseling, 2015
- Dashboards for improving patient care: Review of the literatureInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2015
- A review of health governance: Definitions, dimensions and tools to governHealth Policy, 2014
- A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and researchInternational Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2012
- An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content AnalysisJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2010
- Dashboards as a ServiceJournal of Service Research, 2009
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns: The Limits of Crisis Management and the Need for ResilienceJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2007
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- The group interview in social researchThe Social Science Journal, 1991