Quantitative multiparametric MRI of ovarian cancer
Open Access
- 4 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 38 (6), 1501-1509
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24119
Abstract
Purpose To identify parameters associated with ovarian malignancy using multiparametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, women with ovarian masses underwent preoperative imaging with 3 T MRI. Dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI with pharmacokinetic modeling, quantitative T2 mapping, and diffusion‐weighted imaging with quantitative mapping of the water diffusion parameters were performed. Ovarian masses had one or more discreet regions of interest, categorized as cystic or solid, and histologically diagnosed as benign or malignant. Mean region of interest (ROI) values were compared between benign and malignant masses using generalized estimating equations. In addition, we compared classification accuracy for the mean ROI value to a combination of histogram characteristics (standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis) from T2 map ROIs using logistic regression and ROC curve. The significance level was P = 0.05. Results Several DCE‐MRI parameters differentiated solid benign from malignant masses. Toft's rate constant (kep) was significantly higher in malignant masses (P < 0.001), as well as quantitative T2 values (P = 0.003), and signal intensity on T2 weighted imaging (P = 0.008). A linear combination of the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis of T2 within solid regions (area under the curve [AUC] 0.90) provided better classification accuracy than the mean of T2 alone (AUC 0.81). Conclusion Quantitative parameters from DCE‐MRI and T2 mapping can differentiate benign from malignant ovarian masses. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;38:1501–1509.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal massesEuropean Radiology, 2009
- Characterization of Adnexal Mass Lesions on MR ImagingAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Diffusion-Weighted Echo Planar Imaging of Ovarian Tumors: Is It Useful to Measure Apparent Diffusion Coefficients?Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2002
- Complex Adnexal Masses: Detection and Characterization with MR Imaging—Multivariate AnalysisRadiology, 2000
- Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced t1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbolsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1999
- Transvaginal ultrasonography of pelvic masses: Evaluation of B-mode technique and Doppler ultrasonographyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Sonography of ovarian masses: poor sensitivity of resistive index for identifying malignant lesions.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.Radiology, 1988