The life cycle of weak signals related to safety
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Inderscience Publishers in International Journal of Emergency Management
- Vol. 6 (2), 117
- https://doi.org/10.1504/ijem.2009.029241
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of weak signals management in the domain of industrial safety. We propose a model of the weak signal life cycle, from its emergence to the decision that should be taken to avoid the related hazard. This model represents this life cycle as four successive steps associated with barriers that the weak signal has to overcome. These four steps are: 1. detection; 2. interpretation; 3. transmission; 4. priority setting. For each of these four barriers we discuss human and organisational factors that may support the efficient management of weak signals. In the detection phase, we identify the complementary roles of attention and vigilance. In the interpretation phase, we study the role of mental representations in sensemaking. In the transmission and priority setting phases, we address the concerns of self-confidence and trust in the organisation.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding Organizational Safety Using Value‐Focused ThinkingRisk Analysis, 2005
- Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary?Cognitive Science, 2004
- Safety climate and safety at work.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2004
- Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizationsAcademy of Management Perspectives, 2001
- Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workloadErgonomics, 2000
- Emergency signal failure: implications and recommendationsErgonomics, 1998
- Interests and credibility: whistleblowers in technological conflictsSocial Science Information, 1996
- Safety in process-control: An operator-centred point of viewReliability Engineering & System Safety, 1992
- Reasoning StrategiesThe Irish Journal of Psychology, 1992
- Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak SignalsCalifornia Management Review, 1975