Chlorhexidine and Alcohol Versus Povidone-Iodine for Antisepsis in Gynecological Surgery
- 1 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Women's Health
- Vol. 20 (3), 321-324
- https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2391
Abstract
Surgical site infections (SSIs) cause severe morbidity and are associated with tremendous health costs. Skin antisepsis (cleansing) with chlorhexidine and alcohol solutions has demonstrated superiority to povidone-iodine in a variety of surgical interventions. Our objective was to determine if chlorhexidine and alcohol antisepsis protocol reduces the rate of SSIs in elective gynecological laparotomies compared with povidone-iodine antisepsis. This retrospective study was carried out at the Department of Gynecology in a tertiary medical center in Tel Aviv. Patients undergoing elective gynecological laparotomies during two periods of time and who were treated with two different antisepsis protocols were included. The protocols for antisepsis were povidone-iodine 10% scrub followed by 10% povidone-iodine in 65% alcohol (n = 145) and chlorhexidine 2% followed by 70% alcohol (n = 111). The rate of SSIs as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the risk factors for the occurrence of SSIs were calculated. Antisepsis with chlorhexidine and alcohol was associated with a reduction in the overall rate of SSIs from 14.6% to 4.5% compared with the povidone-iodine protocol (p = 0.011). The two groups of patients were similar in regard to baseline characteristics and medical history. Surgical procedures as well as the type of cut, drains, and tension suture use were similar in the two groups. Patients with SSIs tended to be older and heavier. Risk factors found to be associated with SSIs were hypertension, noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), immunodeficiency, and the use of the povidone-iodine antisepsis protocol. This retrospective study demonstrates that antisepsis with chlorhexidine and alcohol was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of SSIs compared to povidone-iodine antisepsis in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparotomies. This is of extreme clinical importance, as a change in antisepsis protocol can significantly reduce the morbidity and healthcare costs associated with patients undergoing elective gynecological surgery.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chlorhexidine–Alcohol versus Povidone–Iodine for Surgical-Site AntisepsisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Is Antibiotic Prophylaxis Necessary in Elective Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Gynecologic Conditions?Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 2009
- Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Colorectal SurgeryArchives of Surgery, 2007
- Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen and the Risk of Surgical Wound InfectionA Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2005
- Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related InfectionsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2002
- Chlorhexidine Compared with Povidone-Iodine Solution for Vascular Catheter–Site CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce the Incidence of Surgical-Wound InfectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The Impact of Surgical-Site Infections in the 1990s: Attributable Mortality, Excess Length of Hospitalization, And Extra CostsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1999
- Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1999
- Perioperative Normothermia to Reduce the Incidence of Surgical-Wound Infection and Shorten HospitalizationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1996