Prehospital Prediction of the Severity of Blunt Anatomic Injury
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Vol. 64 (3), 754-760
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000244384.85267.c5
Abstract
To evaluate the ability of paramedics to predict patients requiring a major trauma service. To assess whether paramedic prediction of severity of injury to individual body regions is accurate and could add to overall paramedic prediction of injury severity. Helicopter paramedics in Victoria prospectively recorded the severity of injury to the head, thoracic, and abdomen regions, and whether the patient required a major trauma service, for primary response adult (>15 years) trauma patients. Paramedic predictions of injuries were compared with patient outcomes. Major trauma was defined as death in hospital; an Injury Severity Score >15; intensive care unit admission >24 hours; and urgent surgery. A severe anatomic injury was defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale severity ≥3. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Two hundred and seven patients were enrolled in the study, with 62.3% defined as major trauma. The sensitivity of paramedic predictions ranged from 57.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 45.4–68.9) for the head to 38.5 (95% CI; 22.1–57.9) for the abdomen. Specificities ranged from 98.3 (95% CI; 93.5–99.6) for the thorax to 93.5 (95% CI; 87.9–96.6) for the head region. The sensitivity and specificity of paramedic predictions of a major trauma status were 97.7 (95% CI; 93–99.2) and 28.2 (95% CI; 19.3–39.1), respectively. The paramedics correctly categorized all patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit, required urgent surgery or died in hospital as major trauma. Paramedics were unable to reliably identify severe injury to individual body regions. Sensitivity of paramedic judgment of major trauma status was high. Assessment of the severity of injury to individual body regions did not appear to improve accuracy.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paramedic Injury Severity Perception Can Aid Trauma TriageAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- A prospective comparison of paramedic judgment and the trauma triage rule in the prehospital settingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- TRAUMA TEAM ACTIVATION FOR `MECHANISM OF INJURY' BLUNT TRAUMA VICTIMSThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1994
- Trauma triage: A nine-year experienceAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- The trauma triage rule: A new, resource-based approach to the prehospital identification of major trauma victimsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- The lack of full correlation between the injury severity score and the resource needs of injured patientsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- TRAUMA TRIAGE IN WESTERN SYDNEY: RESULTS OF A PILOT STUDYAnz Journal of Surgery, 1990
- The failure of prehospital trauma prediction rules to classify trauma patients accuratelyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Injury severity determination: Requirements, approaches, and applicationsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1986
- Ineffectiveness of the trauma score and the CRAMS scale for accurately triaging patients to trauma centersAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985