"GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
Open Access
- 6 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Respiratory Research
- Vol. 13 (1), 13
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-13
Abstract
Background The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) defines COPD as a fixed post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) below 0.7. Age-dependent cut-off values below the lower fifth percentile (LLN) of this ratio derived from the general population have been proposed as an alternative. We wanted to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic capability of the GOLD and LLN definition when compared to an expert-based diagnosis. Methods In a prospective cohort study, 405 patients aged ≥ 65 years with a general practitioner's diagnosis of COPD were recruited and followed up for 4.5 (median; quartiles 3.9; 5.1) years. Prevalence rates of COPD according to GOLD and three LLN definitions and diagnostic performance measurements were calculated. The reference standard was the diagnosis of COPD of an expert panel that used all available diagnostic information, including spirometry and bodyplethysmography. Results Compared to the expert panel diagnosis, 'GOLD-COPD' misclassified 69 (28%) patients, and the three LLNs misclassified 114 (46%), 96 (39%), and 98 (40%) patients, respectively. The GOLD classification led to more false positives, the LLNs to more false negative diagnoses. The main predictors beyond the FEV1/FVC ratio for an expert diagnosis of COPD were the FEV1 % predicted, and the residual volume/total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC). Adding FEV1 and RV/TLC to GOLD or LLN improved the diagnostic accuracy, resulting in a significant reduction of up to 50% of the number of misdiagnoses. The expert diagnosis of COPD better predicts exacerbations, hospitalizations and mortality than GOLD or LLN. Conclusions GOLD criteria over-diagnose COPD, while LLN definitions under-diagnose COPD in elderly patients as compared to an expert panel diagnosis. Incorporating FEV1 and RV/TLC into the GOLD-COPD or LLN-based definition brings both definitions closer to expert panel diagnosis of COPD, and to daily clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early detection of COPD combined with individualized counselling for smoking cessation: A two-year prospective studyScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2010
- Inhaled Anticholinergics and Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2008
- Using the lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio reduces the misclassification of airway obstructionThorax, 2008
- Current clinical guideline definitions of airflow obstruction and COPD overdiagnosis in primary careEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2008
- Validation of FEV6 in the elderly: correlates of performance and repeatabilityThorax, 2008
- FEV1/FVC Ratio of 70% Misclassifies Patients With Obstruction at the Extremes of AgeSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2006
- The effect of tiotropium on exacerbations and airflow in patients with COPDEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2006
- Interpretative strategies for lung function testsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2005
- Unrecognized heart failure in elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paperEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2004