Secondary Overtriage: A Consequence of an Immature Trauma System
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 206 (1), 131-137
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.285
Abstract
Trauma systems are designed to bring the injured patient to definitive care in the shortest practical time. This depends on prehospital destination criteria (primary triage) and interfacility transfer guidelines (secondary triage). Although primary undertriage is associated with increased costs and worse outcomes for selected injuries, secondary overtriage can overwhelm system resources and delay definitive care. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of secondary overtriage in a region without a formal trauma system. Retrospective cohort study of trauma registry data at an American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma-verified Level I trauma center and regional referral center. Secondary overtriage was defined as patients transferred from another hospital emergency department to our trauma receiving unit who had an injury severity score < 10, did not require an operation, and who were discharged to home within 48 hours of admission. Data on 9,064 patients were reviewed; 6,875 (76%) arrived directly from the scene and 2,189 (24%) were transferred. Although the transferred group was more severely injured, the majority (64%) had minor injuries and 824 (39%) met secondary overtriage criteria. The degree of secondary overtriage and injury pattern varied with respect to referring facility. Peak admission day and times for overtriage patients coincided with scene admissions trauma receiving unit closure events. Patient payor mix and facility cost and reimbursement profiles did not differ between scene and transfer overtriage patients. A substantial proportion of transferred trauma patients require only brief diagnostic or observational care. Excessive overtriage calls for development of a regional inclusive trauma system with established primary and secondary triage guidelines to improve access to care and trauma system efficiency.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Requests for 692 Transfers to an Academic Level I Trauma Center: Implications of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor ActJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2007
- Socioeconomic Factors, Medicolegal Issues, and Trauma Patient Transfer Trends: Is There a Connection?Journal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2006
- Are Patients Being Transferred to Level-I Trauma Centers for Reasons Other Than Medical Necessity?The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 2006
- Inclusive Trauma Systems: Do They Improve Triage or Outcomes of the Severely Injured?Journal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2006
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcome of Severely Injured Patients Treated in Trauma Centers Following the Establishment of Trauma SystemsJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2006
- A National Evaluation of the Effect of Trauma-Center Care on MortalityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Access to Trauma Centers in the United StatesJAMA, 2005
- Transfer Times to Definitive Care Facilities Are Too LongAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- 2003 “Clarification” of Controversial EMTALA Requirement for 24/7 Coverage of Emergency Departments by On-call Specialists, Significant Impact on Trauma CentersJournal of Emergency Nursing, 2004
- Progress in the development of trauma systems in the United States. Results of a national surveyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995