Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial
Top Cited Papers
- 23 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Vol. 4 (3), 199-207
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30004-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scoring System to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After PancreaticoduodenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2015
- Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Should Not Be Routine for Resection of Periampullary TumorsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015
- Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stagesBMJ, 2013
- Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experienceSurgical Endoscopy, 2012
- Midline Versus Transverse Incision in Major Abdominal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2009
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastrooesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Extended Lymph-Node Dissection for Gastric CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomySurgical Endoscopy, 1994