Hemodynamic effects of 6% and 10% hydroxyethyl starch solutions versus 4% albumin solution in septic patients
- 30 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
- Vol. 20 (7), 528-533
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.05.022
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morbidity in hospitalized patients receiving human albumin: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- A Comparison of Albumin and Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in the Intensive Care UnitNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Hypoalbuminemia in Acute Illness: Is There a Rationale for Intervention?Annals of Surgery, 2003
- Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- An international view of hydroxyethyl starchesIntensive Care Medicine, 1999
- Advantages of a narrow-range, medium molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch for volume maintenance in a porcine model of fecal peritonitisCritical Care Medicine, 1991
- Macromolecules reduce abnormal microvascular permeability in rat limb ischemia-reperfusion injuryCritical Care Medicine, 1989
- Effects of pentastarch and albumin infusion on cardiorespiratory function and coagulation in patients with severe sepsis and systemic hypoperfusionCritical Care Medicine, 1989
- Surgical wound infections: An overviewAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1981
- INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS TO COLLOID VOLUME SUBSTITUTESThe Lancet, 1977