How Uncertainty and Accountability can Derail Strategic ‘Save Life’ Decisions in Counter‐Terrorism Simulations: A Descriptive Model of Choice Deferral and Omission Bias
- 28 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
- Vol. 25 (2), 165-187
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.723
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions?Heart, 2007
- Control and legacy as functions of perceived criticality in major incidentsJournal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2004
- Bias as a Research Strategy in Participant Observation: The Case of Intergroup ConflictField Methods, 2001
- JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKINGAnnual Review of Psychology, 1998
- Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making AnalysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- How Problems are Solved: Reconsidering the Phase TheoremOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Effects of Procedural and Outcome Accountability on Judgment QualityOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errorsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- Computing lag sequential statistics on dyadic time interval data: The TLAG programBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1988