Psychosocial Influences on Low Back Pain, Disability, and Response to Treatment
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal
- Vol. 91 (5), 712-721
- https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100280
Abstract
Evidence suggests that psychosocial factors have an influence on the outcome of physical therapy treatment and that the extent of their influence differs considerably among patients. As a consequence, substantial research efforts are focused on developing new clinical tools designed to identify and highlight when psychosocial factors are present at a level relevant to decision making. The conceptual differences in the ways that psychosocial factors influence outcome are described, structured around 3 common research terms: (1) prognostic factors, (2) treatment effect modifiers or moderators, and (3) treatment mediators. Prognostic factors are those characteristics that help estimate a patient's likely outcome irrespective of the chosen management. Treatment effect modifiers or moderators are factors measured at baseline that influence the relationship between a specific intervention and outcome. Treatment mediators are factors that have an intermediary role in the link between treatment and outcome. How these different influences on outcome can be translated into useful and complementary tools that aim to reduce treatment variability in clinical practice is described. One approach is to use prognostic factors to develop screening tools that identify an individual's risk status, typically based on predictive psychosocial factors such as catastophizing and depression. Another approach is to identify specific treatment effect modifiers to derive treatment decision aids or prediction rules to help match a patient's characteristics to the interventions available. A third approach is to use treatment mediators (eg, self-efficacy) to develop monitoring tools to inform the clinician about which aspects of treatment to strengthen.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subgrouping patients with low back pain in primary care: Are we getting any better at it?Manual Therapy, 2011
- What is the prognosis of back pain?Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
- The relationship between patient and practitioner expectations and preferences and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for knee osteoarthritisEuropean journal of pain, 2010
- Subgrouping low back pain: A comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening QuestionnaireEuropean journal of pain, 2010
- Clinical Outcomes for Patients Classified by Fear-Avoidance Beliefs and Centralization PhenomenonArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2009
- A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatmentArthritis Care & Research, 2008
- How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapistsPain, 2008
- Value of predictive instruments to determine persisting restriction of function in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain. Systematic reviewEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- Chapter 3 European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary careEuropean Spine Journal, 2006
- Preliminary Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Determining Which Patients With Low Back Pain Will Respond to a Stabilization Exercise ProgramArchives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2005