Teaching Theories of Hunger and Eating: Overcoming Students' Misconceptions
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Teaching of Psychology
- Vol. 25 (1), 44-46
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2501_14
Abstract
Questionnaire data suggest that students' preconceptions about hunger and eating are inconsistent with contemporary theories. In general, students adhere to a set-point model, whereas current research indicates that the feeding system prevents energy deficits rather than reacts to them. Instructors should explicitly describe students' preconceptions about hunger and eating, discuss the incompatibility of these preconceptions with the empirical evidence, and introduce contemporary theories as alternative conceptions. This approach is effective both in overcoming students' misconceptions about hunger and eating and in increasing student involvement.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The psychobiology of mealsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1994
- Promoting Conceptual Change in Science: A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Instructional Interventions from Reading Education and Science EducationReading Research Quarterly, 1993
- The eating paradox: How we tolerate food.Psychological Review, 1991
- A functionalistic approach to feeding.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1990
- Comprehension of Counterintuitive Science Text: Effects of Prior Knowledge and Text StructureThe Journal of Educational Research, 1989
- Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricityInternational Journal of Science Education, 1987
- Stimulus control of eating: Implications for a two-factor theory of hungerAppetite, 1985
- Naive Knowledge and Science LearningResearch in Science & Technological Education, 1983
- THE PHYSIOLOGY OF APPETITEBritish Medical Bulletin, 1981
- The Control of Ingestive Behaviour by Internal and External Stimuli—A Theoretical ReviewAppetite, 1981