Is Wetter Better? An Evaluation of Over-the-Counter Personal Lubricants for Safety and Anti-HIV-1 Activity
Open Access
- 7 November 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (11), e48328
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048328
Abstract
Because lubricants may decrease trauma during coitus, it is hypothesized that they could aid in the prevention of HIV acquisition. Therefore, safety and anti-HIV-1 activity of over-the-counter (OTC) aqueous- (n = 10), lipid- (n = 2), and silicone-based (n = 2) products were tested. The rheological properties of the lipid-based lubricants precluded testing with the exception of explant safety testing. Six aqueous-based gels were hyperosmolar, two were nearly iso-osmolar, and two were hypo-osmolar. Evaluation of the panel of products showed Gynol II (a spermicidal gel containing 2% nonoxynol-9), KY Jelly, and Replens were toxic to Lactobacillus. Two nearly iso-osmolar aqueous- and both silicone-based gels were not toxic toward epithelial cell lines or ectocervical or colorectal explant tissues. Hyperosmolar lubricants demonstrated reduction of tissue viability and epithelial fracture/sloughing while the nearly iso-osmolar and silicon-based lubricants showed no significant changes in tissue viability or epithelial modifications. While most of the lubricants had no measurable anti-HIV-1 activity, three lubricants which retained cell viability did demonstrate modest anti-HIV-1 activity in vitro. To determine if this would result in protection of mucosal tissue or conversely determine if the epithelial damage associated with the hyperosmolar lubricants increased HIV-1 infection ex vivo, ectocervical tissue was exposed to selected lubricants and then challenged with HIV-1. None of the lubricants that had a moderate to high therapeutic index protected the mucosal tissue. These results show hyperosmolar lubricant gels were associated with cellular toxicity and epithelial damage while showing no anti-viral activity. The two iso-osmolar lubricants, Good Clean Love and PRÉ, and both silicone-based lubricants, Female Condom 2 lubricant and Wet Platinum, were the safest in our testing algorithm.This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Slippery Slope: Lubricant Use and Rectal Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Newly Identified RiskSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2012
- Identification of Personal Lubricants That Can Cause Rectal Epithelial Cell Damage and Enhance HIV Type 1 Replicationin VitroAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2011
- Structure and Function of Intercellular Junctions in Human Cervical and Vaginal Mucosal Epithelia1Biology of Reproduction, 2011
- Safety and effectiveness of BufferGel and 0.5% PRO2000 gel for the prevention of HIV infection in womenAIDS, 2011
- PRO2000 vaginal gel for prevention of HIV-1 infection (Microbicides Development Programme 301): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Disruption of Tight Junctions by Cellulose Sulfate Facilitates HIV Infection: Model of Microbicide SafetyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Preclinical development of the green tea catechin, epigallocatechin gallate, as an HIV-1 therapyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2009
- Acceptability and Use of Sexual Barrier Products and Lubricants among HIV-Seropositive Zambian MenAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2008
- Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of published studiesAIDS, 2008
- Acceptability of Microbicidal Surrogates Among Zambian WomenSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2008