A Comparison of Adherence Assessment Methods Utilized in the United States: Perspectives of Researchers, HIV-Infected Children, and their Caregivers
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in AIDS Patient Care and STDs
- Vol. 23 (8), 593-601
- https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2009.0021
Abstract
This study sought to elucidate methodological issues in adherence research by comparing multiple methods of assessing adherence to antiretroviral medication. From 2003 to 2004, 24 youths with vertically infected HIV disease (mean age = 14.0 years; range, 8–18) and their caregivers participated in a 6-month study. These children were all on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and were relatively healthy (mean CD4 absolute count = 711.8 ± 604.5). Adherence was assessed with the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), pill counts, and interviews. Patients and caregivers completed the Perceptions of Adherence Study Participation (PASP) questionnaire. MEMS provided the most detailed adherence information, and good reliability was indicated by significant correlations with medical markers. Pill counts provided similar adherence rates, while patients and caregivers reported nearly perfect adherence in interviews. Problems were experienced with each method: MEMS were expensive, had cap malfunctions, and lack a consistent guiding principle for data interpretation. With pill counts, families forgot to bring all medication bottles to clinic, and interviews were compromised by social desirability and difficulty reaching families by telephone. Most patients and caregivers believed study participation improved the child's adherence, although PASP ratings were unrelated to adherence at the study endpoint. While MEMS may be most reliable, pill counts offer comparable data and are less costly, while interviews seemed least accurate in this study. Most participants reported positive perceptions of their research experience. A consensus among researchers is needed for defining and measuring adherence, and specific recommendations are offered for achieving this goal.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring Medication Adherence by Unannounced Pill Counts Conducted by Telephone: Reliability and Criterion-Related ValidityHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2008
- Assessment of Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Perinatally HIV-Infected Children and Youth Using Self-Report Measures and Pill CountJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2008
- Simple Adherence Assessments to Predict Virologic Failure among HIV-Infected Adults with Discordant Immunologic and Clinical Responses to Antiretroviral TherapyAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2008
- Family Experiences with Pediatric Antiretroviral Therapy: Responsibilities, Barriers, and Strategies for Remembering MedicationsAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2008
- Age-associated predictors of medication adherence in HIV-positive adults: Health beliefs, self-efficacy, and neurocognitive status.Health Psychology, 2007
- Predictors of Adherence to Antiretroviral Medications in Children and Adolescents With HIV InfectionPublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2006
- Self-Report Measures of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence: A Review with Recommendations for HIV Research and Clinical ManagementAIDS and Behavior, 2006
- Predictors of Nonadherence to HIV‐Related Medication Regimens During Methadone StabilizationThe American Journal on Addictions, 2001
- Adherence to zidovudine (AZT) among HIV-infected methadone patients: a pilot study of supervised therapy and dispensing compared to usual careDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 1995
- Accuracy of indirect measures of medication compliance in hypertensionResearch in Nursing & Health, 1985