Effective reproduction numbers are commonly overestimated early in a disease outbreak
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 30 (9), 984-994
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4174
Abstract
Reproduction numbers estimated from disease incidence data can give public health authorities valuable information about the progression and likely size of a disease outbreak. Here, we show that methods for estimating effective reproduction numbers commonly give overestimates early in an outbreak. This is due to many factors including the nature of outbreaks that are used for estimation, incorrectly accounting for imported cases and outbreaks arising in subpopulations with higher transmission rates. Awareness of this bias is necessary to correctly interpret estimates from early disease outbreak data. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza Community Transmission Was Established in One Australian State When the Virus Was First Identified in North AmericaPLOS ONE, 2010
- Estimation of the Serial Interval of InfluenzaEpidemiology, 2009
- The Impact of Dispersion in the Number of Secondary Infections on the Probability of an EpidemicJournal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 2008
- Real Time Bayesian Estimation of the Epidemic Potential of Emerging Infectious DiseasesPLOS ONE, 2008
- Quantifying the transmission potential of pandemic influenzaPhysics of Life Reviews, 2008
- A likelihood‐based method for real‐time estimation of the serial interval and reproductive number of an epidemicStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Quantifying social distancing arising from pandemic influenzaJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2007
- Comparative estimation of the reproduction number for pandemic influenza from daily case notification dataJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2006
- Appropriate Models for the Management of Infectious DiseasesPLoS Medicine, 2005
- On the spread of a disease with gamma distributed latent and infectious periodsBiometrika, 1980