The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review
- 7 June 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 112 (8), 1007-1015
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00623.x
Abstract
To evaluate the risks and benefits of inducing labour in women with a prior caesarean delivery. Systematic review. Pregnant women with prior caesarean delivery. Studies were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, reference lists and experts. All studies reporting data for outcomes in women with induced labours and prior caesarean were eligible. Methodologic quality was evaluated using the criteria of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. We assigned studies good, fair or poor rating. We reviewed 162 full text articles, identified 14 fair-quality studies, and found no good-quality studies. Compared with spontaneous labour, induction was more likely to result in caesarean delivery. Of women undergoing spontaneous labour, 20% had a caesarean (range 11-35%) compared with 32% receiving oxytocin (range 18-44%). In studies of PGE2, spontaneous labour resulted in caesarean delivery in 24% (range 18-51%) compared with 48% with PGE2 (range 28-51%). There was a non-significant increase in uterine ruptures among those induced compared with spontaneous labours. There were no maternal deaths; other maternal complications were infrequently reported. Only four studies reported on infant deaths; other infant outcomes were inadequately reported. Women with a history of caesarean attempting trial of labour who require induction have a higher rate of caesarean delivery and have a slightly elevated risk of rupture compared with similar women with spontaneous labour. More consideration is needed for potential confounders: dose, reasons for induction and appropriate comparison groups.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Committee opinionObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the processAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2001
- Weekly administration of prostaglandin E2 gel compared with expectant management in women with previous cesareansObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Disruption of Prior Uterine Incision following Misoprostol for Labor Induction in Women with Previous Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Prostaglandin E2for Cervical Ripening: A Multicenter Study of Patients with Prior Cesarean DeliveryAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1997
- Trial of Labor Following Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- Mifepristone for labour induction after previous caesarean sectionBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Prostaglandin E2Gel Induction of Patients with a Prior Low Transverse Cesarean SectionAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1992
- Vaginal Birth After Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1990
- Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional ReviewsEducational Researcher, 1986