The Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index: Self‐Reporting Versus Actual Performance in the Old‐Old (≥ 75 years)
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 45 (7), 832-836
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01510.x
Abstract
The Barthel Index for assessing activities of daily living (ADL) was developed particularly for young stroke patients, but it now has a wider application in the geriatric assessment profile. This study tests the validity of the Barthel Index by self-report in the old-old (> or = 75 years). If more than 10% of the studied population assessed themselves incorrectly (> or = 15-point discrepancy), the test may have limitations. We set out to try to quantify and explain this discrepancy. During a 3-month period, we tested 126 old-old patients, both geriatric medical inpatients and subjects from the community, in a cross-sectional study. Using the Barthel Index, their functional status was assessed by self-report and by observation of performance. A measure of the magnitude of discrepancy between the two methods (discrepancy score) was calculated as the difference between the self-report and performance total scores. Comparing the self-report with actual ADL performance scores, the mean score for self-report was higher (90 vs 88). There was a low Kappa score in all areas of the scale (range 0.103-0.398). Twenty of the 126 patients (15.9%) scored 15 or more points in the discrepancy score. By running a multiple linear regression, we were able to explain only 21% of the variance in the discrepancy score (R2 = .21). Significant explanatory variables were the presence of cognitive impairment, source of patients from acute geriatric ward, and age (very old > or = 85 years). For the purpose of this study, use of the Barthel Index by self-reporting was found to have its limitations in the old-old (> or = 75 years), particularly with regard to the very old (> or = 85 years) medical geriatric inpatients. Therefore, we suggest that the older people may have to be assessed by the rehabilitation services using a performance-based measure or a different self-report test for documenting their activities of daily living, bearing in mind that self-reported and performance-based measures capture physical abilities differently.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of the Barthel Index and the OPCS Disability Instrument used to Measure Outcome after Acute StrokeAge and Ageing, 1995
- The Barthel ADL Index: Scoring by the Physician from Patient Interview is not ReliableAge and Ageing, 1993
- The assessment of disability in patients on an acute medical ward for elderly peopleDisability and Rehabilitation, 1993
- Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients.Stroke, 1991
- Social and family integration of hemiplegic elderly patients 1 year after stroke.Stroke, 1990
- Predicting discharge status at commencement of stroke rehabilitation.Stroke, 1989
- The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability studyInternational Disability Studies, 1988
- The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability?International Disability Studies, 1988
- VALIDATION OF A BRIEF SCREENING TEST FOR DEPRESSION IN THE ELDERLYAge and Ageing, 1987
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1975