The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 9 (15), 5539-5561
- https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5539-2009
Abstract
Climate geoengineering proposals seek to rectify the Earth's current and potential future radiative imbalance, either by reducing the absorption of incoming solar (shortwave) radiation, or by removing CO2 from the atmosphere and transferring it to long-lived reservoirs, thus increasing outgoing longwave radiation. A fundamental criterion for evaluating geoengineering options is their climate cooling effectiveness, which we quantify here in terms of radiative forcing potential. We use a simple analytical approach, based on energy balance considerations and pulse response functions for the decay of CO2 perturbations. This aids transparency compared to calculations with complex numerical models, but is not intended to be definitive. It allows us to compare the relative effectiveness of a range of proposals. We consider geoengineering options as additional to large reductions in CO2 emissions. By 2050, some land carbon cycle geoengineering options could be of comparable magnitude to mitigation "wedges", but only stratospheric aerosol injections, albedo enhancement of marine stratocumulus clouds, or sunshades in space have the potential to cool the climate back toward its pre-industrial state. Strong mitigation, combined with global-scale air capture and storage, afforestation, and bio-char production, i.e. enhanced CO2 sinks, might be able to bring CO2 back to its pre-industrial level by 2100, thus removing the need for other geoengineering. Alternatively, strong mitigation stabilising CO2 at 500 ppm, combined with geoengineered increases in the albedo of marine stratiform clouds, grasslands, croplands and human settlements might achieve a patchy cancellation of radiative forcing. Ocean fertilisation options are only worthwhile if sustained on a millennial timescale and phosphorus addition may have greater long-term potential than iron or nitrogen fertilisation. Enhancing ocean upwelling or downwelling have trivial effects on any meaningful timescale. Our approach provides a common framework for the evaluation of climate geoengineering proposals, and our results should help inform the prioritisation of further research into them.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simultaneous observations of aerosol–cloud–albedo interactions with three stacked unmanned aerial vehiclesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO 2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO 2 emissionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- Reconciling surface ocean productivity, export fluxes and sediment composition in a global biogeochemical ocean modelBiogeosciences (online), 2006
- Permanent carbon dioxide storage in deep-sea sedimentsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- Geoengineering: Worthy of Cautious Evaluation?Climatic Change, 2006
- Earth rings for planetary environment controlActa Astronautica, 2006
- Relating MODIS‐derived surface albedo to soils and rock types over Northern Africa and the Arabian peninsulaGeophysical Research Letters, 2002
- Estimation of surface albedo from space: A parameterization for global applicationJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994