Interpretation of Linear and Computed Tomograms in the Assessment of Implant Recipient Sites

Abstract

Tomography is a radiographic process that produces cross-sectional images of bony structures within the body. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic measurements made by dental implant team members from linear tomograms of human cadaver mandibles. Five partially edentulous cadaver mandibles were radiographed using linear tomography (LT) and computer-assisted tomography (CT). From the tomograms, each of four team members traced the perceived outer circumference of the mandible and the inferior alveolar canal. Tomogram tracings were compared to each other and to the equivalent CT cross-sectional image to determine the precision of the measurements. One mandible was sectioned to verify the accuracy of the CT images. Repeated measures analysis of variance of the measurements made from the LT and CT scans showed significant statistical differences between team members. Multiple cross-sectional views facilitated identification of the inferior alveolar canal in the majority of CT scans, whereas image blurring inherent to LT resulted in the inability of team members to identify the canal in 14% to 50% of the images. Volume averaging within the CT slice aperture was found capable of producing a magnification error of short dense objects. CT and LT must both be interpreted cautiously because of innate technique objects. CT and LT must both be interpreted cautiously because of innate technique pecularities that can lead to measurement errors. The wide variation in interpretation of the linear tomograms and frequent inability to identify the inferior alveolar canal made this technique less valuable than the reformatted CT when planning dental surgical procedures.