Randomized trial of initial trophic versus full-energy enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 39 (5), 967-974
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31820a905a
Abstract
Objective: Enteral nutrition is provided to mechanically ventilated patients who cannot eat normally, yet the amount of support needed is unknown. We conducted this randomized, open-label study to test the hypothesis that initial low-volume (i.e., trophic) enteral nutrition would decrease episodes of gastrointestinal intolerance/complications and improve outcomes as compared to initial full-energy enteral nutrition in patients with acute respiratory failure. Design: Randomized, open-label study. Patients: A total of 200 patients with acute respiratory failure expected to require mechanical ventilation for at least 72 hrs. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either initial trophic (10 mL/hr) or full-energy enteral nutrition for the initial 6 days of ventilation. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome measure was ventilator-free days to day 28. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 98 patients randomized to trophic and the 102 patients randomized to full-energy nutrition. At enrollment, patients had a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 26.9 and a Pao2/Fio2 ratio of 182 and 38% were in shock. Both groups received similar durations of enteral nutrition (5.5 vs. 5.1 days; p = .51). The trophic group received an average of 15.8% ± 11% of goal calories daily through day 6 compared to 74.8% ± 38.5% (p < .001) for the full-energy group. Both groups had a median of 23.0 ventilator-free days (p = .90) and a median of 21.0 intensive-care-unit-free days (p = .64). Mortality to hospital discharge was 22.4% for the trophic group vs. 19.6% for the full-energy group (p = .62). In the first 6 days, the trophic group had trends for less diarrhea (19% vs. 24% of feeding days; p = .08) and significantly fewer episodes of elevated gastric residual volumes (2% vs. 8% of feeding days; p < .001). Conclusion: Initial trophic enteral nutrition resulted in clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure similar to those of early full-energy enteral nutrition but with fewer episodes of gastrointestinal intolerance.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gastric Residual Volume in the ICUJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2010
- Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: An analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Strategies to Manage Gastrointestinal Symptoms Complicating Enteral FeedingJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2008
- Parenteral Nutrition Impairs Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue and Mucosal Immunity by Reducing Lymphotoxin β Receptor ExpressionAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Bacterial translocation studied in 927 patients over 13 yearsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Home Enteral Nutrition from the Provider's PerspectiveJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2002
- Early versus late enteral feeding of mechanically ventilated patients: results of a clinical trialJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2002
- Enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Effect of Rate of Enteral Nutrient Supply on Gut MassJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1992