Practice nurses' workload, career intentions and the impact of professional isolation: A cross-sectional survey
Open Access
- 25 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Nursing
- Vol. 9 (1), 2
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-9-2
Abstract
Practice nurses have a key role within UK general practice, especially since the 2004 GMS contract. This study aimed to describe that role, identify how professionally supported they felt and their career intentions. An additional aim was to explore whether they felt isolated and identify contributory factors. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey in one large urban Scottish Health Board, targeted all practice nurses (n = 329). Domains included demographics, workload, training and professional support. Following univariate descriptive statistics, associations between categorical variables were tested using the chi-square test or chi-square test for trend; associations between dichotomous variables were tested using Fisher's Exact test. Variables significantly associated with isolation were entered into a binary logistic regression model using backwards elimination. There were 200 responses (61.0% response rate). Most respondents were aged 40 or over and were practice nurses for a median of 10 years. Commonest clinical activities were coronary heart disease management, cervical cytology, diabetes and the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although most had a Personal Development Plan and a recent appraisal, 103 (52.3%) felt isolated at least sometimes; 30 (15.5%) intended leaving practice nursing within 5 years.Isolated nurses worked in practices with smaller list sizes (p = 0.024) and nursing teams (p = 0.003); were less likely to have someone they could discuss a clinical/professional (p = 0.002) or personal (p < 0.001) problem with; used their training and qualifications less (p < 0.001); had less productive appraisals (p < 0.001); and were less likely to intend staying in practice nursing (p = 0.009). Logistic regression analysis showed that nurses working alone or in teams of two were 6-fold and 3.5-fold more likely to feel isolated. Using qualifications and training to the full, having productive appraisals and planning to remain in practice nursing all mitigated against feeling isolated. A significant proportion of practice nurses reported feeling isolated, at least some of the time. They were more likely to be in small practices and more likely to be considering leaving practice nursing. Factors contributing to their isolation were generally located within the practice environment. Providing support to these nurses within their practice setting may help alleviate the feelings of isolation, and could reduce the number considering leaving practice nursing.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of pay‐for‐performance on professional boundaries in UK general practice: an ethnographic studySociology of Health & Illness, 2009
- Impact of the 2004 GMS contract on practice nurses:British Journal of General Practice, 2008
- Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic studyBMJ, 2007
- Team climate for innovation: what difference does it make in general practice?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- All or none measurement: why we know so little about the comprehensiveness of careInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2006
- Organizational configuration of hospitals succeeding in attracting and retaining nursesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2006
- New opportunities for nurses and other healthcare professionals?Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2006
- Low‐perceived work ability, ageing and intention to leave nursing: a comparison among 10 European countriesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2006
- Deprivation and volunteering by general practices: cross sectional analysis of a national primary care systemBMJ, 2005
- Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care — A Major Experiment in the United KingdomThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004