Expected long-term defect rate of analytical performance in the medical laboratory: Assured Sigma versus observed Sigma
Open Access
- 15 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine in Biochemia Medica
- Vol. 28 (2), 020101
- https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2018.020101
Abstract
Reliability of laboratory results is determined by the ratio of incorrect results expected in long-term. Sigma is a measure of defect ratio, therefore long-term Sigma is a measure of the reliability of laboratory results. Commonly, long-term Sigma is estimated based on the short-term Sigma. The Six Sigma methodology assumes that in long-term performances will shift up to 1.5 Sigma, and therefore the long-term Sigma is considered 1.5 Sigma less than short-term Sigma. Analytical performance in the medical laboratory is prone to shifts larger than 1.5 Sigma. Thus, the 1.5 Sigma shift assumed in the Six Sigma is not a correct estimate in the medical laboratory. On the other hand, in the medical laboratory statistical quality control procedure (SQC) is applied to detect and correct shifts. Since SQC can be planned to trap shifts of different sizes, the threshold set for SQC determines the defect rate expected for long-term.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating new HbA1c methods for adoption by the IFCC and NGSP reference networks using international quality targetscclm, 2017
- Investigation of 2 Models to Set and Evaluate Quality Targets for Hb A1c: Biological Variation and Sigma-MetricsClinical Chemistry, 2015
- A new approach to calculating the Sigma Metric in clinical laboratoriesAccreditation and Quality Assurance, 2015
- Utilization of Assay Performance Characteristics to Estimate Hemoglobin A1c Result ReliabilityClinical Chemistry, 2014