Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors
Open Access
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Cadernos de Saude Publica
- Vol. 25 (1), 7-28
- https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2009000100002
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to measure the prevalence of inappropriate emergency department (ED) use by adults and associated factors. The review included 31 articles published in the last 12 years. Prevalence of inappropriate ED use varied from 20 to 40% and was associated with age and income. Female patients, those without co-morbidities, without a regular physician, without a regular source of care, and those not referred to the ED by a physician also showed more inappropriate ED use, with the relative risk varying from 1.12 to 2.42. Difficulties in accessing primary health care (difficulties in setting appointments, longer waiting periods, and short business hours at the primary health care service) were also associated with inappropriate ED use. Thus, primary care requires fully qualified patient reception and efficient triage to promptly attend cases that cannot wait. It is also necessary to orient the population on situations in which they should go to the ED and on the disadvantages of consulting the ED when the case is not really urgent.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate useBMC Health Services Research, 2007
- Primary care patients in the emergency department: Who are they? A review of the definition of the ‘primary care patient’ in the emergency departmentEmergency Medicine Australasia, 2005
- Nonurgent Emergency Department Patient Characteristics and Barriers to Primary CareAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Propuesta y validación del Protocolo de Adecuación de Urgencias Hospitalarias modificadoMedicina Clinica, 2004
- Inappropriate use of an accident and emergency department: Magnitude, associated factors, and reasons—An approach with explicit criteriaAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2001
- Utilización inadecuada de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario. Una evaluación con criterios explícitosGaceta Sanitaria, 1999
- Can primary care and community-based models of emergency care substitute for the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department?Health Policy, 1998
- Judging who needs emergency department care: A prerequisite for policy-makingThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctorsBMJ, 1995
- Health Care Reform and Emergency MedicineAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995