Are transcripts reproducible?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 July 2022
- journal article
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company in Pragmatics
- Vol. 10 (2), 247-269
- https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.2.05con
Abstract
The research reported here is part of a larger psycholinguistic project on transcribing and the use of transcripts. It is hypothesized that reproducing transcripts originally prepared on the basis of current transcription systems overloads the capability of those who carry out transcript reproduction and therefore occasions an excessive error rate. Ten reproduced transcripts were taken from (a) three current textbooks (Duranti 1997; Garman 1990; Whitney 1998), and from (b) an earlier textbook (Levinson 1983); and (c) six versions were taken from a German transcript (Keppler 1987). Additions, deletions, substitutions, and relocations of notations were identified according to five categories: Verbal, prosodie, paralinguistic, extralinguistic, and format components. The hypothesis is supported: The overall rate of change is 6.6 syllables per change (2032/308) across all 41 comparisons. Factors underlying this excessive amount of change are discussed. The proposal is made that only those notations be made which are to be used for analyses in keeping with the purposes of the research in question.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- D&S ForumDiscourse & Society, 1998
- Linguistic AnthropologyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- How do transcribers deal with audio recordings of spoken discourse?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1995
- Der Verlauf von KlatschgesprächenZeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 1987
- Zur Systematik der Beschreibung verbaler und nonverbaler KommunikationPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1986
- 'Ritin' Fowklower Daun 'Rong: Folklorists' Failures in PhonologyJournal of American Folklore, 1982
- A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation**This chapter is a variant version of “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation,” which was printed in Language, 50, 4 (1974), pp. 696–735. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference on “Sociology of Language and Theory of Speech Acts,” held at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research of the University of Bielefeld, Germany. We thank Dr. Anita Pomerantz and Mr. Richard Faumann for pointing out to us a number of errors in the text.Published by Elsevier BV ,1978
- The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversationLanguage, 1977
- A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for ConversationLanguage, 1974
- Opening up ClosingsSemiotica, 1973