Nonrestorative low anterior resection portends increased local recurrences - results from the Dutch snapshot research group
- 1 May 2021
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 23 (5), 1270-1271
- https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15580
Abstract
We were very interested to read this article titled ‘Does oncological outcome differ between restorative (r‐LAR) and non‐restorative low anterior resection (n‐rLAR) in patients with primary rectal cancer?’ from the Dutch snapshot research group. The authors conclude that n‐rLAR was associated with a poorer oncological outcome compared to r‐LAR[1]. Further, they state that this relation appeared non‐causal even though they found independent association of n‐rLAR with higher local recurrence (LR) and worse overall survival (OS), acknowledging unmeasured confounders; namely the reason for choosing n‐rLAR, surgeon experience, technical difficulties amongst others.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does oncological outcome differ between restorative and nonrestorative low anterior resection in patients with primary rectal cancer?Colorectal Disease, 2021
- Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification ModelAnnals of Surgery, 2016
- Multicenter Study of Outcome in Relation to the Type of Resection in Rectal CancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2014
- Comparison of Logistic Regression versus Propensity Score When the Number of Events Is Low and There Are Multiple ConfoundersAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2003