Non-Helmeted Motorcyclists: A Burden to Society? A Study Using the National Trauma Data Bank
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care
- Vol. 57 (5), 944-949
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000149497.20065.f4
Abstract
Helmet laws remain controversial. Opponents believe negative findings are a result of biased statistical analyses that fail to account for the impact of alcohol and drugs. In this study, we evaluated the effect that helmet use had upon injury severity, outcome controlling for alcohol or drug use, resource utilization, and financial burden using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Two groups of patients, helmeted and non-helmeted motorcyclists, were identified using the NTDB over an 8-year period. Group differences were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for dichotomous outcomes. To evaluate the effect that alcohol or drug use had on mortality, logistic regression models were created. A total of 9,769 patients were identified by the NTDB of which 6756 (69.2%) were helmeted and 3013 (30.8%) were non-helmeted. Helmet use was associated with lower injury severity, mortality, and resource utilization. Non-helmeted motorcyclists accrued greater hospital charges and were significantly less likely to have health insurance. When controlling for alcohol or drug use, mortality continued to be significantly associated with non-helmet use. Non-helmeted motorcyclists have worse outcomes than their helmeted counterparts independent of the use of alcohol or drugs. Furthermore, they monopolize more hospital resources, incur higher hospital charges, and as non-helmeted motorcyclists frequently do not have insurance, reimbursement in this group of patients is poor. Thus, the burden of caring for these patients is transmitted to society as a whole.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Italy's motorcycle helmet law on traumatic brain injuriesInjury Prevention, 2003
- The Negative Impact of the Repeal of the Arkansas Motorcycle Helmet LawJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2002
- Autopsy Study of Motorcyclist Fatalities: The Effect of the 1992 Maryland Motorcycle Helmet Use LawAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2002
- The effect of the Taiwan motorcycle helmet use law on head injuriesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2000
- The Impact of Two Related Prevention Strategies on Head Injury Reduction among Nonfatally Injured Motorcycle Riders, California, 1991–1993Journal of Neurotrauma, 1995
- Injury Prevention Strategies to Promote Helmet Use Decrease Severe Head Injuries at a Level I Trauma CenterJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1995
- The Impact of the Texas 1989 Motorcycle Helmet Law on Total and Head-Related Fatalities, Severe Injuries, and Overall InjuriesMedical Care, 1992
- Motorcycle crash injuries and costs: Effect of a reenacted comprehensive helmet use lawAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Motorcycle Helmets—Medical Costs and the LawJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1990
- Medical Consequences of Motorcycle Helmet NonusageJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1984