Government Programs for Commercial Redevelopment in Poor Neighborhoods: The Cases of Spitalfields in East London and Downtown Brooklyn, NY
Open Access
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 26 (2), 215-234
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a260215
Abstract
Since the economic crisis of the mid-1970s, urban governments in the United States and Great Britain have used programs to stimulate office development as their main vehicle for encouraging economic growth. Two cases of government-sponsored redevelopment are compared: Spitalfields in East London and downtown Brooklyn, New York. Both are in impoverished peripheral areas and involve the creation of large projects that require a transformation of land uses; each involves the activity of a public-private partnership. Despite some differences in types of governmental activity that result from different ideological and institutional traditions, the elements of the two projects are strikingly alike.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Property-Led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo?Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1992
- Promoting Economic Development Urban Planning in the United States and Great BritainJournal of the American Planning Association, 1991
- Urban Government under Thatcher and ReaganUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1989
- Urban Regeneration in London Docklands: A Five-Year Policy ReviewEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1988