The value of the difference between ED and prehospital vital signs in predicting outcome in trauma
- 24 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 31 (7), 579-582
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-202271
Abstract
Introduction Traditional vital signs are seen as an important part of trauma assessment, despite their poor predictive value in this regard. Objective This study evaluated whether the difference between systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and shock index (SI) taken in the emergency department (ED) and prehospital can predict 48 h mortality postadmission following trauma. Methods Retrospective cohort was obtained from the Trauma Audit and Research Network. Subjects were excluded if head or spinal injuries, prehospital intubation or CPR were present. Main outcome was 48 h mortality. The difference (delta, Δ) between ED and prehospital values were used as study variables (ie, ΔSI=SI-ED minus SI-prehospital). Accuracy was assessed using area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC). AUROC coordinates were used to identify 95% specificity cut points and described further using sensitivity and likelihood ratios (LRs). Results Significant AUROC statistics were revealed for ΔSBP (0.57) and ΔRR (0.56) for the full sample, ΔSBP (0.62) and ΔSI (0.65) for moderate, and ΔRR (0.6) for severe injury. Best LRs were 3.4 and 2.4 for ΔRR and ΔSI, respectively, but sensitivities were low (<=26%). Cut point values for ΔSBP, ΔRR and ΔSI were 37 mm Hg, 8 breaths/min and 0.2, respectively. Discussion ΔSBP and ΔRR performed best overall, but ΔSI performed best in the moderate injury group, suggesting earlier identification with ΔSI. Use of Δ values result in good rule-in of 48 h mortality and may supplement trauma treatment decisions.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Utility of admission physiology in the surgical triage of isolated ballistic battlefield torso traumaJournal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock, 2012
- Identifying Risk for Massive Transfusion in the Relatively Normotensive Patient: Utility of the Prehospital Shock IndexThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2011
- Hemodynamic Reactions in Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock From Blunt Trauma After Initial Fluid TherapyThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2010
- Identifying Life-Threatening Shock in the Older Injured Patient: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data BankThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2010
- Utility of the Shock Index in Predicting Mortality in Traumatically Injured PatientsThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- The impact of advanced age on trauma triage decisions and outcomes: A statewide analysisThe American Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Trauma Team Activation Criteria as Predictors of Patient Disposition from the Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage guidelines for the identification of major trauma in elderly motor vehicle crash victimsJournal of Emergency Nursing, 2003
- Shock Index as a Marker for Significant Injury in Trauma PatientsAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1996
- A Comparison of the Shock Index and Conventional Vital Signs to Identify Acute, Critical Illness in the Emergency DepartmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994