Unrealistic Assumptions in Rational Choice Theory
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Philosophy of the Social Sciences
- Vol. 37 (2), 115-138
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107299684
Abstract
The most common argument against the use of rational choice models outside economics is that they make unrealistic assumptions about individual behavior. We argue that whether the falsity of assumptions matters in a given model depends on which factors are explanatorily relevant. Since the explanatory factors may vary from application to application, effective criticism of economic model building should be based on model-specific arguments showing how the result really depends on the false assumptions. However, some modeling results in imperialistic applications are relatively robust with respect to unrealistic assumptions.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Rational Choice TheoryAnnual Review of Sociology, 2003
- Institutionalism as a MethodologyJournal of Theoretical Politics, 2003
- On Money PumpsGames and Economic Behavior, 2001
- The Empirical Content of Rational Choice TheoryJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1999
- Limitations of Rational Choice TheoryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1998
- Bounded Rationality in Individual Decision MakingExperimental Economics, 1998
- Practical Tortoise RaisingMind, 1995
- A Theory of Rational AddictionJournal of Political Economy, 1988
- The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market MechanismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970
- Irrational Behavior and Economic TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 1962