GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 121, 62-70
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.023
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current and Former Smoking and Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPLoS Medicine, 2013
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor ResearchPLoS Medicine, 2013
- Relative risk of cervical cancer in indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Public Health Policy, 2012
- Biomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registryNature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with haemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: a systematic reviewEuropean Heart Journal, 2008
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary RevascularizationEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Identification of Clinically Useful Cancer Prognostic Factors: What Are We Missing?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography in Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1994