An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Prognostic Factors in Neck Pain: Results from the International Collaboration on Neck Pain (ICON) Project
Open Access
- 20 September 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in The Open Orthopaedics Journal
- Vol. 7 (1), 494-505
- https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010494
Abstract
Given the challenges of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability, establishing a clear prognosis in the acute stage has become increasingly recognized as a valuable approach to mitigate chronic problems. Neck pain represents a condition that is common, potentially disabling, and has a high rate of transition to chronic or persistent problems. As a field of research, prognosis in neck pain has stimulated several empirical primary research papers, and a number of systematic reviews. As part of the International Consensus on Neck (ICON) project, we sought to establish the general state of knowledge in the area through a structured, systematic review of systematic reviews (overview). An exhaustive search strategy was created and employed to identify the 13 systematic reviews (SRs) that served as the primary data sources for this overview. A decision algorithm for data synthesis, which incorporated currency of the SR, risk of bias assessment of the SRs using AMSTAR scoring and consistency of findings across SRs, determined the level of confidence in the risk profile of 133 different variables. The results provide high confidence that baseline neck pain intensity and baseline disability have a strong association with outcome, while angular deformities of the neck and parameters of the initiating trauma have no effect on outcome. A vast number of predictors provide low or very low confidence or inconclusive results, suggesting there is still much work to be done in this field. Despite the presence of multiple SR and this overview, there is insufficient evidence to make firm conclusions on many potential prognostic variables. This study demonstrates the challenges in conducting overviews on prognosis where clear synthesis critieria and a lack of specifics of primary data in SR are barriers.Full TexKeywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pain, perceived injustice and the persistence of post-traumatic stress symptoms during the course of rehabilitation for whiplash injuriesPain, 2009
- Deep muscle pain, tender points and recovery in acute whiplash patients: A 1-year follow-up studyPain, 2008
- Is It Time for a Population Health Approach to Neck Pain?Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- A New Conceptual Model of Neck PainSpine, 2008
- Course and Prognostic Factors for Neck Pain in Whiplash-Associated Disorders (WAD)Spine, 2008
- The relationship between sensory and sympathetic nervous system changes and posttraumatic stress reaction following whiplash injury—a prospective studyJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2006
- A Systematic Review of the Prognosis of Acute Whiplash and a New Conceptual Framework to Synthesize the LiteratureSpine, 2001
- Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general populationPain, 2001
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EARLY SOMANTIC, RADIOLOGICAL, CONGNITIVE AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FINDINGS AND OUTCOME DURING A ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP IN 117 PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM COMMON WHIPLASHRheumatology, 1994