Microarray and Growth Analyses Identify Differences and Similarities of Early Corn Response to Weeds, Shade, and Nitrogen Stress
Open Access
- 1 June 2012
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 60 (2), 158-166
- https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-11-00090.1
Abstract
Weed interference with crop growth is often attributed to water, nutrient, or light competition; however, specific physiological responses to these stresses are not well described. This study's objective was to compare growth, yield, and gene expression responses of corn to nitrogen (N), low light (40% shade), and weed stresses. Corn vegetative parameters from V2 to V12 stages, yield parameters, and gene expression using transcriptome (2008) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (2008/09) analyses at V8 were compared among the stresses and with nonstressed corn. N stress did not affect vegetative parameters, although grain yield was reduced by 40% compared with nonstressed plants. Shade, present until V2, reduced biomass and leaf area > 50% at V2, and recovering plants remained smaller than nonstressed plants at V12. However, grain yields of shade-stressed and nonstressed plants were similar, unless shade remained until V8. Weed stress reduced corn growth and yield in 2008 when weeds remained until V6. In 2009, weed stress until V2 reduced corn vegetative growth, but yield reductions occurred only if weed stress remained until V6 or later. Principle component analysis of differentially expressed genes indicated that shade and weed stress had more similar gene expression patterns to each other than they did to nonstressed or N-stressed tissues. However, corn grown in N-stressed conditions shared 252 differentially expressed genes with weed-stressed plants. Ontologies associated with light/photosynthesis, energy conversion, and signaling were down-regulated in response to all three stresses. Shade and weed stress clustered most tightly together, based on gene expression, but shared only three ontologies, O-METHYLTRANSFERASE activity (lignification processes), POLY(U)-BINDING activity (posttranscriptional gene regulation), and stomatal movement. Based on morphologic and genomic observations, weed stress to corn was not explained by individual effects of N or light stress. Therefore, we hypothesize that these stresses share limited signaling mechanisms.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corn Response to Competition: Growth Alteration vs. Yield Limiting FactorsAgronomy Journal, 2009
- The importance of light quality in crop–weed competitionWeed Research, 2009
- Red–far-red ratio of reflected light: a hypothesis of why early-season weed control is important in cornWeed Science, 2004
- Comparison of the critical period for weed control in wide- and narrow-row cornWeed Science, 2004
- An evaluation of four crop : weed competition models using a common data setWeed Research, 2003
- Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarraysNature Genetics, 2002
- Enhancing the competitive ability of cropsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2001
- Carbon and nitrogen sensing and signaling in plants: emerging ‘matrix effects’Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2001
- Acclimation of barley to changes in light intensity: chlorophyll organizationPhotosynthesis Research, 1990
- Far-Red Radiation Reflected from Adjacent Leaves: An Early Signal of Competition in Plant CanopiesScience, 1990