GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 February 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 111, 105-114
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Assessing evidence in public health: the added value of GRADEJournal of Public Health, 2012
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistencyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendationsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategiesBMJ, 2008
- Transparent Development of the WHO Rapid Advice GuidelinesPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliographyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004