Standardizing Foot-Type Classification Using Arch Index Values
- 1 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) in Physiotherapy Canada
- Vol. 64 (3), 280-283
- https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2011-40
Abstract
Purpose: The lack of a reliable classification standard for foot type makes drawing conclusions from existing research and clinical decisions difficult, since different foot types may move and respond to treatment differently. The purpose of this study was to determine interrater agreement for foot-type classification based on photo-box-derived arch index values. Method: For this correlational study with two raters, a sample of 11 healthy volunteers with normal to obese body mass indices was recruited from both a community weight-loss programme and a programme in physical therapy. Arch index was calculated using AutoCAD software from footprint photographs obtained via mirrored photo-box. Classification as high-arched, normal, or low-arched foot type was based on arch index values. Reliability of the arch index was determined with intra-class correlations; agreement on foot-type classification was determined using quadratic weighted kappa (κw). Results: Average arch index was 0.215 for one tester and 0.219 for the second tester, with an overall range of 0.017 to 0.370. Both testers classified 6 feet as low-arched, 9 feet as normal, and 7 feet as high-arched. Interrater reliability for the arch index was ICC=0.90; interrater agreement for foot-type classification was κw=0.923. Conclusions: Classification of foot type based on arch index values derived from plantar footprint photographs obtained via mirrored photo-box showed excellent reliability in people with varying BMI. Foot-type classification may help clinicians and researchers subdivide sample populations to better differentiate mobility, gait, or treatment effects among foot types.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of healthy children's feet—Nine-year results of a longitudinal investigation of plantar loading patternsGait & Posture, 2010
- The relationship of body mass index, age and triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness with the foot arch structure of postmenopausal womenClinical Biomechanics, 2010
- Validity of Plantar Surface Visual Assessment as an Estimate of Foot Arch HeightMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2010
- Correlation Between Static Foot Type Measurements and Clinical AssessmentsFoot & Ankle International, 2009
- Foot structure in overweight and obese childrenPediatric Obesity, 2008
- The reliability and reproducibility of foot type measurements using a mirrored foot photo box and digital photography compared to caliper measurementsJournal of Biomechanics, 2007
- The Feet of Overweight and Obese Young Children: Are They Flat or Fat?Obesity, 2006
- Foot type classification: a critical review of current methodsGait & Posture, 2002
- Biomechanical gait evaluation of the immediate effect of orthotic treatment for flexible flat footProsthetics and Orthotics International, 1998
- The arch index: A useful measure from footprintsJournal of Biomechanics, 1987