Clinical decision-making: coping with uncertainty
Open Access
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Heart
- Vol. 78 (920), 319-321
- https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.920.319
Abstract
Reliable research and audit information are essential to increasing medical knowledge and improving health service delivery. However there are limits to available information in terms of quality, reliability, and applicability. Furthermore, however much information is gathered, there will always be a degree of uncertainty at the point of making clinical decisions with individual patients. Unrealistic lay and professional expectations of the efficacy of information and that certainty is achievable, may be altering the traditional clinician-patient relationship. One therapeutic role of a clinician is containing the anxieties aroused in the context of uncertainty, and this role may be becoming more difficult. Reliance on protocols and fear of reprimand may lead to clinicians, in some areas of medical care, abandoning their patients at a time of need.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviewsBMJ, 2001
- Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health careBMJ, 2001
- Placebo response in depression: Bane of research, boon to therapyThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- Evidence based medicine overviews, bulletins, guidelines, and the new consensusHeart, 2000
- Variability in meta-analytic results concerning the value of cholesterol reduction in coronary heart disease: a meta-meta-analysis.American Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical researchBMJ, 1997
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- The interaction of task difficulty and motivation: The Yerkes-Dodson law revivedActa Psychologica, 1959
- ber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und MechanikThe European Physical Journal A, 1927