Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 29 (3), 3-30
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
Abstract
In this essay, I begin by identifying the reasons that automation has not wiped out a majority of jobs over the decades and centuries. Automation does indeed substitute for labor—as it is typically intended to do. However, automation also complements labor, raises output in ways that leads to higher demand for labor, and interacts with adjustments in labor supply. Journalists and even expert commentators tend to overstate the extent of machine substitution for human labor and ignore the strong complementarities between automation and labor that increase productivity, raise earnings, and augment demand for labor. Changes in technology do alter the types of jobs available and what those jobs pay. In the last few decades, one noticeable change has been a “polarization” of the labor market, in which wage gains went disproportionately to those at the top and at the bottom of the income and skill distribution, not to those in the middle; however, I also argue, this polarization and is unlikely to continue very far into future. The final section of this paper reflects on how recent and future advances in artificial intelligence and robotics should shape our thinking about the likely trajectory of occupational change and employment growth. I argue that the interplay between machine and human comparative advantage allows computers to substitute for workers in performing routine, codifiable tasks while amplifying the comparative advantage of workers in supplying problem-solving skills, adaptability, and creativity.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Untangling Trade and Technology: Evidence from Local Labour MarketsThe Economic Journal, 2015
- Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”Science, 2014
- The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United StatesThe American Economic Review, 2013
- 50 Years of object recognition: Directions forwardComputer Vision and Image Understanding, 2013
- The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor MarketAmerican Economic Review, 2013
- The “task approach” to labor markets: an overviewZeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung, 2013
- Top Incomes in the Long Run of HistoryJournal of Economic Literature, 2011
- Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the RevisionistsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2008
- The Polarization of the U.S. Labor MarketAmerican Economic Review, 2006
- The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical ExplorationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003