Effectiveness, training and quality assurance of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
- 24 March 2015
- Vol. 64 (6), 982-990
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308076
Abstract
Screening for colorectal cancer has been proven to be effective in reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. While the precise benefit of screening exclusively by colonoscopy is not yet known, unarguably, the exam is central to the success of any screening programme. The test affords the opportunity to detect and resect neoplasia across the entire large bowel and is the definitive examination when other screening tests are positive. However, colonoscopy is invasive and often requires sedation as well as extensive bowel preparation, all of which puts the patient at risk. Furthermore, the test can technically be demanding and, unarguably, there is variation in how it is performed. This variation in performance has now been definitively linked to important outcome measures. For example, interval cancers are more common in low adenoma detectors as compared with high adenoma detectors. This review outlines the most current thinking regarding the effectiveness of colonoscopy as a screening tool. It also outlines key concepts to optimise its performance through robust quality assurance programmes and high-quality training.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopistsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2012
- Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating ScaleEndoscopy, 2012
- Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Long-Term Prevention of Colorectal-Cancer DeathsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in NijmegenBritish Journal of Cancer, 2011
- Recommendations for Post-Polypectomy Surveillance in Community PracticeDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2011
- Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Serious Complications Within 30 Days of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy Are UncommonClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2010
- Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975‐2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future ratesCancer, 2009
- Utilization and Yield of Surveillance Colonoscopy in the Continued Follow-Up Study of the Polyp Prevention TrialClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
- Medical Errors Involving TraineesArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007